No description
- Python 88.4%
- C# 8.7%
- Shell 2.9%
`JEV_TRACE` alone cannot be joined to a decision: it records a time to the second and the answers, with no run, step or action, so nothing in it can be traced back to a run. Wrap the client in `RecordingClient` so the last call's questions and answers travel with the decision row they produced, and give each process a `SESSION_ID` so rows from two sessions in the same second stay apart. Diff the history directory before and after a session to attribute the run records it produced. What this supports is arm-level analysis: this decision belongs to this session, and the session's outcome is the run file. It does NOT say whether an individual answer was correct -- one run result attached to one step cannot label that step. Per-decision accuracy needs replay, expert judgement, or ground truth the code can verify on its own (lethal, legality, affordability). A decision that asked nothing must carry no answers, so `client.last` is cleared before each decide(); otherwise rows silently inherit the previous step's answers. |
||
|---|---|---|
| capture | ||
| docs | ||
| utils | ||
| vendor | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| ab_card_skip.sh | ||
| brain.py | ||
| capture.py | ||
| eval_batch.sh | ||
| facts.py | ||
| jev.py | ||
| run.py | ||
| sts2.py | ||
| test_brain.py | ||
| test_facts.py | ||
| test_run.py | ||