test(timing): compare prefetch cancellation with published observations
This commit is contained in:
parent
8f22092e06
commit
8930ea93b4
14 changed files with 487 additions and 8 deletions
|
|
@ -23,8 +23,9 @@ Background progress cannot cause an early ROM-file lookup or change instruction
|
|||
Its [bus integration](https://github.com/jsgroth/jgenesis/blob/fab6e2ccc60e492dd68b7f1e927b0829a6d80195/backend/gba-core/src/bus.rs) separates CPU delivery cycles from background transfers and DMA ownership.
|
||||
- [NanoBoyAdvance 128 KiB boundary test at cc3f4a28](https://codeberg.org/nba-emu/hw-test/src/commit/cc3f4a286cdef823980d9b353bd70befc9927d28/bus/128kb-boundary/source/main.c) tests data LDM and DMA boundaries.
|
||||
Reading this test does not validate active opcode-queue crossings. It was not run here.
|
||||
- [PrefetchAbuse](https://github.com/zaydlang/PrefetchAbuse) appeared in search results as a cartridge-access cancellation test lead.
|
||||
Only its search excerpt was reviewed. No expectations or implementation code were taken from it.
|
||||
- [PrefetchAbuse at 9ca57c13](https://github.com/zaydlang/PrefetchAbuse/blob/9ca57c13da7e3c569937f99a42e7c1caca029a2d/src/main.c) supplies published hardware read-cancellation observations.
|
||||
A later [original probe](prefetch-cancellation.md) matches the instruction-boundary differences, but exposes incorrect bulk timer sampling.
|
||||
The source, README, and build assumptions were reviewed. No upstream implementation or ROM was imported.
|
||||
|
||||
No external implementation or ROM was added to the repository.
|
||||
No physical-hardware measurement or external-emulator differential run was performed.
|
||||
|
|
@ -134,6 +135,8 @@ Public ARM, Thumb, memory, and BIOS reports match the preceding ordered-timing c
|
|||
Debug and release reports also match. Original CPU and timer demo traces are unchanged.
|
||||
These public checkpoints do not independently validate active prefetch timing.
|
||||
|
||||
Next, validate this queue against independent timing tests, especially full-buffer restart, cancellation, and page boundaries.
|
||||
The later [cancellation comparison](prefetch-cancellation.md) matches published read observations only at instruction boundaries.
|
||||
Actual timer readings still fail because device updates occur after the timer-load instruction.
|
||||
Next, implement ordered timer observations and validate full-buffer restart and page boundaries independently.
|
||||
Cold-start timing, live WAITCNT reconfiguration, per-access device scheduling, and sub-instruction DMA arbitration remain incomplete.
|
||||
Exact bus history, display contention, configurable EWRAM timing, and timer/IRQ delays remain separate work.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue